Final post to this blog

Greetings --

I'm consolidating my blog writing and will no longer be posting on this site. You can continue to follow my latest posts at:

Learning To Make Perfume

Marketing Your Own Perfume

Thanks for your interest in this blog.

-- Phil

Another 5-Day Workshop

"The Art & Technology of Perfumery"

New York City, May 11-15, 2015

British perfumer Stephen V. Dowthwaite is coming to the U.S. once again to present a 5-Day Perfumery Workshop in New York City -- "The Art & Technology of Perfumery."
Notice the emphasis on technology. This isn't about learning to recognize today's most popular perfumes. This isn't about wine and crackers. It is about developing creative skills backed by technical knowledge -- the knowledge that allows you to translate your creative vision into perfume.

No random mixing here. No settling for a beautiful scent that is NOT the beautiful scent you set out to create. This is goal orientated perfumery -- professional perfumery. This is a chance to learn to make perfume using the same techniques professional perfumers use for multi-national clients. Yes, as a student your first creations will be a little rough around the edges but, if you are motivated, this workshop can be the beginning of your journey into perfume.

No prior experience is required. All materials (100's!) are provided with your enrollment.

Details here. Don't miss it!

If you want to attend, contact me for discount information.

If you miss this workshop, follow the postings on the PerfumersWorld website for their next workshop (although it is not likely to be in the U.S.)

Niche markets and their importance

    I'm running a contest to seek out people who, given a chance, can sell perfume. It's called the "Marketer Most Likely To Sell The Most Perfume" contest and the prize for the winners will be perfume, with their own brand name and artwork on each bottle, to sell. The "entry form" is a simple business plan in which the contestant explains how he or she would sell their own perfume, if they had their own perfume to sell.

    I'm coaching the contestants as I want to see more than one winner and part of my coaching is to advise them to find niches where they have or can develop a following, even though the niche may seem very small at first. In fact, in my Perfume Strategies newsletter I've been writing about several global marketing giants that, in order to expand even further, have tailored promotions to what they previously might have considered to be insignificant niches, too small to bother with.

    Because of the contest, my own efforts to market perfume, and what I've been observing and writing about concerning global marketing giants, I was a bit taken back when I came across an online article suggesting "finding your niche is bad advice." So I read the article, thinking that I might gain insight. Sadly it was a sham. It was also a warning that successful marketing requires solid data, genuine research, thought, and common sense.

    The author of the article begins by posing a false and very misleading view of what a niche is. He then describes what he claims to the the antithesis of a niche and, not surprisingly, defines a niche.

    In case you stumble across this article, which I won't link to, I'll give you an example of his incorrect thinking.

    As an example of a niche he chooses "single moms needing work at home income to help support their children." Bizarrely he suggests this niche will be extinguished when the children grow up and the moms move on. In this he proclaims his ignorance of one of any marketer's most important chores -- customer acquisition -- constantly adding new customers to the database, knowing that over time even the best existing customers will drop out. New customer acquisition is an essential function for any successful business (the other essential being selling additional products to existing customers.)

    When this fellow "defines" the "right" approach to gathering up customers, he talks about shared interests rather than age, sex, race, home town, etc. -- but this is exactly what defines a great many niches.

    I'll make one more comment about this unhelpful article. The author suggests that you can attract followers by taking a controversial point of view, a view which might be silly but will stand out. This reminds me of the days when a manufacturer of packaging machinery might use a girl in a swimsuit to advertise his machines in trade magazines. The girl (please remember,  a model are always referred to as "the girl" rather than "a young women") in the bikini attracted the eyes of male viewers -- but when they looked at the ad, all they saw or thought of was the girl. A person actually looking for packaging machinery might miss the ad entirely, or be put off by the advertisers crude appeal.

    So there are two lessons here. If you are an individual or small business trying to sell your own perfume you will be selling into a niche of some sort -- people who are attracted to you, what you are doing, your perfumes, your graphics, or something that brings them together in your customer base. Once you have it, you can define it, but it will be your niche that you are defining.

    The second and lesser point -- an honest position pays. You don't have to be phony controversial to attract people who really will become your customers. Be yourself, enjoy yourself, be real with your customers. The marketer who catches attention with false promises is unlikely to develop a strong, enduring following. Fool people and, in the future, they are likely to avoid you, and that's not good for business.

    Footnote: We had a local business, a restaurant, that gave away coupons -- but then you came to eat and redeem your coupon, they always found some loophole to dishonor it. Their food was excellent but word got around and in a short time they were gone.

    You can follow our contest through our free newsletter, "Perfume Strategies You Missed This Month" or you can register for the contest here. (It costs nothing to register! You have nothing to lose!)

What does it take to sell perfume? Why do people buy it?

Can you sell as much perfume as she did?

    A gift? Recommendation? Like the way it smelled on a friend? How often do you go out and sample fragrances you've never heard of and then buy one -- for $45 or more -- even when you know nothing about it, nothing about the company that made it, the company that markets it (they are probably not the same companies) and other people who are buying and wearing it?

    Given the cost of a nice perfume, unless you have a deep interest in scents themselves, you (1) probably buy perfume only rarely, and (2) probably buy only perfumes known to have some credentials. Now think about that from the point of view of someone who wants to sell their own perfume.

    If you are the seller of a perfume, say one that you have made yourself or is being made for you, the big question is, "How do I give my fragrance credentials to make it sell?"

    Some try to do it with the packaging. Packaging companies encouraged the belief that great packaging is a must if you want to make sales. But unless the packaging is so grand that the package itself becomes a collectible work of art, packaging at best can only sway the buyer between competing brands.

    Some try to make sales by making a great scent. For the most part this is even more futile than trying to make sales with great packaging. Certainly it is important that the prospective customer finds the scent pleasing. But many scents can be pleasing. Few people will buy a perfume simply because they like the scent (although few perfume buyers would admit this.)

    The fact is we are surrounded by beautiful scents but very few buyers have noses discriminating enough to pick the real gems by scent alone.

    The truth is perfume is sold, for the most part, through its credentials.

    Ask yourself why Chanel's No.5 is still a top seller, 100 years after its prototype was released? The answer is simple. It is famous. Even the most ignorant are aware of it. Buying No.5 is like buying your big office computer from IBM. The saying goes "Nobody ever for fired for buying IBM." Likewise no gift giver -- husband, lover, family member, or friend -- ever went wrong by giving No.5.

    But the whole world isn't No.5. There are hundreds of other fragrances on the market. So ask yourself, which ones SELL? Look behind the sales of any perfume that is being sold profitably and you'll find that it has a high credibility factor with the purchaser.

    So if you want to sell your own perfume you MUST do something to give it that credibility factor. In short, you must have a marketing strategy that goes beyond "good glass, good juice."

    In case you aren't aware of this, the vast majority of money spent on perfume goes into designer fragrances, celebrity fragrances and cosmetic company fragrances. (Almost all of the top selling fragrances in all of these groups are manufactured by no more than half a dozen companies.)

    The "credibility" comes from the fame of the designer, the cosmetics company, or the celebrity. These are the "you can't go wrong" choices for buyers.

    But for all the focus on these groups and their perfumes, a considerable amount of profitable sales are made outside this circuit -- by people who have managed to establish credibility for their fragrances in innovative ways.

    One possibility is to hook your fragrance onto the fame of a celebrity who can't say no. Charlotte Corday (photo above) never endorsed a line of perfumes but her name was used anyway. Corday's fame came from stabbing Marat in the bathtub and losing her head on the guillotine. In France in the 1920's this was considered very chic.

    I've been working to build credibility for a fragrance I created. While I could market it in my own name on my own website, I felt that it could do better in the hands of people who had more of a following than I do. So I've turned the marketing over to The Big Takeover, a reggae band, and they are offering it under the name, "Children of the Rhythm," which is also the name of their latest CD.

    Besides working on my own fragrances and dreaming up ways to sell them, I write a monthly newsletter for the Perfume Makers & Marketers Club directed largely to marketing strategies that can be adopted to selling perfume. Making a great perfume is wonderful. But if you can make one -- and sell it -- that is truly grand!

    By the way, you can get a 3-month Club Membership for just $21.95. If you're trying to market a fragrance of your own, you'd be wise to give us a try.



 

A video on the way to selling perfume

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kMLDVOqMBM

    
   As announced repeatedly, I've been working a marketing plan for a fragrance called "Confusion II," named after a piece of sculpture of the same name. Part of the plan involves producing a video for a select group of people I want  to involve in selling this fragrance, and this video is still about two weeks away from completion.

    But, in the process of doing the "real" video, I came up with a sin off that some have found entertaining -- "hypnotic" my wife called it.

    The video appears to be too much to post directly here on Blogger but you can view it directly on YouTube if you want. The title for this "entertainment" version of the video is "Confusion II Video". You might enjoy it.

Why TV commercials for celebrity perfumes may not be selling at full strength

    I wrote yesterday about memory and scent and the possibility that a multimedia promotion for a perfume might have the potential to implant a deep scent memory that could, when triggered in the future, bring back a strong desire for that particular fragrance.

    Now a logical response to this suggestion might be, "What about all the celebrity fragrance commercials on TV where the celebrity is a singer? Isn't their plan to create a memorable event for the viewer?"

    My answer is that while that may be the plan, the general result falls short and for several good reasons.

    First, look at the relationship between the celebrity and the fragrance marketer. The marketer takes a license to use the celebrity's name and image. But the license is for a fixed period of time, perhaps just three years. Only if sales targets are met will renewal be allowed.

    So a commercial that might trigger memories and desires for the perfume in four, or six, or ten years could be considered a costly, wasted effort.

    Typically even when a license is renewed, by year two the marketer is already throwing the money at a second perfume, allowing the first to fade into the background.

    Next there is a problem of rights to the music. Few celebrity performers compose their own music and so the rights issue comes up again. To use a tune to trigger memories three years down the road, the marketer must have the rights to use that music, three years down the road. And, since the marketer doesn't have a clue as to how effective the recall reaction might be in sales dollars, the gamble could be huge.

    The same problem arises in the use of music that is already associated with the celebrity. A celebrity fragrance TV commercial may run just 30 seconds. But the hits the celebrity has recorded would run considerably longer. Will the owner of the music allow it to be cut for the commercial? Will the owner allow it to be used for a commercial at all? Will the celebrity agree to record it, thus perhaps changing the association from the celebrity to the perfume?
   
    You would have to look into it, case by case.

    So you might say, why not compose music especially for the commercial? But commercials generally mix talk with music. And, while special music would generally be composed for a perfume ad, will enough effort be put behind it to make it truly memorable -- by itself -- without the talk which will be recorded over it?

    Again rights rear their head. Will the celebrity be willing to record a special song for the perfume? Will he or she get royalties from the use of this song in addition to the money made from the sale of the perfume? Will royalties continue into the future when perhaps the marketer no longer has the rights to sell the perfume?

    For the marketer of a celebrity fragrance the practical approach is to keep it simple, to avoid risks, to avoid setting up unnecessary unknowns. So maybe, just maybe, the potential for future sales is diminished but if you have to license this and that and create this and that, all without knowing if it can be of any help to you, is it worth the risk?

    On the other hand, if it was your perfume ... and you could control ALL the circumstances ... wouldn't you want to at least TRY to create that big memory, a memory that might stick with people for years, keeping interest in your perfume alive -- and profitable?

Can a multimedia experience implant a deep memory and desire for your perfume?

Can a tume trigger a desire for a scent?

    Advertisers, for years, have sought to associate popular musical works with their products. At this time of the year -- the holiday season -- we are hearing the jingle of Christmas tunes on radio and TV commercials. Why? Because the music, it is hoped, will make the listener favorably disposed toward the product.

    While "marketing through music" is a well established technique and millions are spent by marketers to license particularly compelling works of popular music, the use of scent to sell products is just now being explored.

    Anecdotal evidence suggests that certain scents, stumbled upon by accident, can (or may) trigger emotional memories from our past.

    While limited scientific evidence of this phenomenon exists, less if any evidence suggests that visual or aural stimulation can trigger the memory of a scent. But it can.

    Once, while watching a foreign film, a love scene took place in a setting that triggered a strong emotional memory for me and my immediate thought was, "there is a SMELL that goes with that setting and that smell isn't there." Without the smell -- this was a film after all -- the scene, to me, was incomplete.

    Now if asked to DESCRIBE that smell I would have difficulty. Smells can be quite difficult to describe in a way that will communicate with any accuracy to others. We really don't have a language for it and the best description I might have given would be to reference the visual setting -- what the eyes of all who saw the film saw -- and then press them to imagine what the smell would be if all those visual elements came together in physical form.

    As I saw the film I had a longing to smell once again that scent which that scene had revived in my memory.

    So is it possible to create visual and aural stimuli that, when presented to the customer, will embed themselves in  the customer's memory and later trigger a desire to purchase the perfume?

    This is what I am trying to achieve in the presentation I am developing for "Confusion II." I have the scent -- the fragrance -- and the music for it is coming together. I've already started to record the tracks and in the next two weeks I'll start shooting raw footage for the video.

    The actual presentation will be quite simple but my hope is that the video, with special music, will create an emotional experience that will "rub off" and create a desire for the perfume.

    Like the film mentioned above the video presentation will not be smellable. So the plan is to use the video in conjunction with demonstrations of the fragrance. The hope is that together the elements will create an emotional memory and that a future exposures to the video, or possibly the music alone, will trigger a desire for the fragrance.

    The relationship between scents and memories has not been well explored but as marketers we might get a jump on science. Our "proof" of success will be in sales numbers.

    If this strategy can be made to work, it could ultimately be well worth the cost of a few failures along the way.